Skip to main content

Analyze test result history

Last updated: April 2026

This document explains how to analyze past test result trends across your project.

Overview of the Test Results Analysis Report dashboard in Katalon TruePlatform

Overview​

Analyzing test result history is crucial for assessing testing quality and ensuring release confidence. It helps teams:

  • Detect abnormal spikes or shifts in failure/blocked rates early
  • Identify flaky or consistently failing tests to prioritize fixes. See Investigate flaky tests to learn more.
  • Compare manual vs. automated execution results
  • Trace regressions to specific intervals, releases, or branches
  • Provide evidence for release readiness and stakeholder communication

Steps to analyze test result history​

In Katalon True Platform, you can access the Test Results Analysis Report through multiple routes:

  • Via the Analytics & Trends dashboard: the Test Execution Results Trend widget can be expanded to navigate to the Test Results Analysis Report.

  • Via Analytics > Reports > Test Results Analysis Report.

Once you've accessed the report, follow these steps to analyze test result history.

Step 1: Configure scope and intervals​

  • Choose Project and Time Range. For short windows use daily grouping; for multi-week or release views use weekly grouping.
  • Filter by Execution Type (Manual / Automated), Release/Sprint, Tester, Platform or Configuration to focus the analysis.

This leads to a focused dataset feeding the trend and distribution visuals so you can spot meaningful patterns.

Step 2: Inspect trend & distribution visuals​

Once data is scoped and filtered to address your concern, spot for patterns or signals:

  • Rising failure slope: a steady upward trend in Failed / Error / Skipped over several intervals (days/weeks) often indicates a regression in the product or a growing set of brittle tests.
  • Sudden spikes in Failed / Error / Skipped counts: one-off or burst spikes often point to a new defect, infra outage, or test environment misconfiguration.
  • High failure concentration by some scope: failures concentrated by Tester, Platform (OS/browser), Release/Branch, or Execution Type (Manual vs Automated) may require targeted investigations.
  • Automated/Manual conflicting results trend: if automated runs show a rising failure rate while manual runs remain stable (or vice versa), this signals a difference in automation quality and stability.

Step 3: Drill down to runs and tests​

  • Click a data point or segment to filter the detail table for that interval.
  • In the detail table, inspect each run's composition (counts of Passed / Failed / Skipped / Error ) and the run duration.
  • Use result badges and the test history link to open the Test Result or Test Run Details page for step-level logs, screenshots, and attachments.
  • Export filtered results to CSV or capture a report snapshot to share with stakeholders.
tip

Turn trends and distributions into explanations by asking Katalon AI Assistant what the visuals suggest.

Was this page helpful?